You HAVE to listen to this, best ost I’ve heard in a couple of years. I forgot to mention that this is 24 bit, 2304 kbs-not regular cd quality, that’s why the file size is bigger than normal. I don’t do flac, you want flac do it your fucking self. I know there’s no difference in quality-I just prefer uncompressed wave. At best you can achieve a 20-30% reduction in size and I just don’t see any need for it.
Comments - 7
zazzo
What’s the source?
zazzo
This could have easily been half the filesize with a five second conversion to FLAC.
HugeGuns
Not sure why OP got their panties in a twist regarding flac. Flac is basically just compressed .wav, there is no difference in terms of quality. It does however make it harder to distribute, as is the case here.
Saying “I don’t do flac” is just telling everyone you’re grossly misinformed on the tech.
cosmic
nice meme
zrdb
Wav bye bye.
TimelessBear
Lel what is this guy’s problem with FLAC?
Anyway, I downloaded it and converted it to FLAC with FFMPEG literally in the time it took me to write this comment.
Here is the command if anyone is interested
In the terminal navigate to the folder with the WAVs. Run it. Requires FFMPEG to be defined in PATH.
Oh, I almost forgot to say this, the whole folder takes up 1.3 GB after conversion. So… the 20-30% is more like 50% in this case.
zrdb
Who gives a flying fuck about flac? 2.3 tbs vs. 1.3 tb (or so you claim), are you really that starved for hdd or ssd space that one measly tb is gonna break the fucking bank? Jesus fucking christ!!